17 DHC 2025
22 - 24 January 2025
Clinical Abstracts (5)
Sessie
Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma in the Netherlands
23 January
17:15 17:30
Frederik Meeuwes
Paper

TREATMENT AND OUTCOME OF BREAST IMPLANT-ASSOCIATED ANAPLASTIC LARGE CELL LYMPHOMA: A POpULATION-BASED COHORT STUDY IN THE NETHERLANDS

Frederik O. Meeuwes (1,2), Mirian Brink (1,3), Marjolein W.M. van der Poel (4), Joost S.P. Vermaat (5), Daphne de Jong (6), Mintsje de Boer de Boer (7), Jonathan Spoor (8), Gerwin A. Huls (1), Wouter J. Plattel (1), Marcel Nijland (1)
(1) University Medical Center Groningen, Hematology, Groningen, (2) Medisch Spectrum Twente, Hematology, Enschede, (3) Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Research and Development, Utrecht, (4) Maastricht University Medical Center, Hematology, (5) Leiden University Medical Center, Hematology, Leiden, (6) Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Pathology, Amsterdam, (7) Maastricht University Medical Center, Plastic Surgery, Maastricht, (8) The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI-AvL), Epidemiology, Amsterdam
No potential conflicts of interest
Introduction

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a rare peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) associated with breast implants. The majority of patients present with stage I disease, often curable by resection. While cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) are commonly used in PTCL, the optimal treatment of AS BIA-ALCL remains unknown. This study aims to describe the treatment and outcome of patients with BIA-ALCL.

Methods

All BIA-ALCL patients up to 2023 were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry with survival follow-up through February 1st, 2024. Baseline characteristics, time between breast cancer (when applicable) and BIA-ALCL, treatment, response to treatment and survival outcomes were collected. Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). OS was defined as the time interval between date of diagnosis of BIA-ALCL and all-cause death. PFS was defined as the time interval between diagnosis of BIA-ALCL and first date of relapse or all-cause death, whichever occurred first.

 

Results

A total of 91 BIA-ALCL cases were identified with a median age of 55 years and a history of breast cancer in 36%. Ann Arbor stage I was frequently diagnosed (74%); stage II (13%) and stage IV (11%) were less common. First-line treatment of stage I patients consisted of tumor excision (88%) or chemotherapy (CT; 12%) with or without radiotherapy (RT; 7%). Of the stage II patients, 33% had resection only, and 67% CT. All stage IV patients received CT. Three patients were consolidated with autologous stem cell transplantation. Relapse, although uncommon in stage I (10%) and stage II (8%) disease, frequently occurred (60%) in stage IV disease. Following second-line treatment, all but one patient remained in remission. The 2-year PFS for stage I, stage II and stage IV was 89%, 83% and 50%, respectively. The 2-year OS was 98%, 92% and 90%, respectively. In univariable analyses, stage IV disease and treatment with CT were associated with a higher risk of relapse, but not with risk of mortality.

Conclusion

In BIA-ALCL, the long-term OS is excellent. However, the risk of relapse for patients with stage IV disease was high, although most patients received successful salvage therapy. There is a need for novel treatment strategies, particularly in stage IV disease.

Attachments
Register
×